Stray dogs in Mexico are suspected of more than five murders

Hey guys I was just scanning the web for some interesting news I could post about stuff like that when I found this it was an article saying how more than five people have been murdered in mexico and the suspect was a pack of feral dogs. But really, was it? I am not exactly a big person on preparing for the apocalypse (which I do not believe in) but what amount of dogs could possibly kill so many people? I think that it was not merely just a large pack of dogs but an ever increasing horde of zombies. I know it sounds stupid but really how stupid is it? A teenage couple was attacked by ten dogs looking somewhat like this

 that poor couple were killed. They were found later with several fatal "dog bites" all over there bodies. The fifth victim in this string of murders was a fifteen year old girl. Prosecutor's said that they have commenced capturing any stray dogs found in parks or other public areas, although a fierce debate has arisen as to what to do with these animals. Put them down. That is sadly for these murderous puppies the only option. Very few families would be willing to take them in and would probably only release them back outside once the animals show aggressive behavior. The stupid thing is that the authorities only starting taking action after another victim or victim's were found dead in the park. This time the victims were a mother and her infant child. This forced authorities into action now up next...

Why It wasn't dogs

If you continue reading that news down to the bottom then you should realize that the authorities had captured thirty-six feral dogs. All of which tested negative for rabies which would be a leading cause of death in the victims. The test results for human blood are stilling coming back. Although after two weeks you would expect the result to have come back and another follow up story been made to supplement this one. Although as you might have found the tests have not come back and no story has been made to follow this up.  I quote this from the news paper

1. "Many family members have expressed skepticism that dogs could have killed their loved ones, saying their injuries appeared too devastating to have been the result of dog bites."
2.  "It's not logical. I mean the dogs are small, they are domestic dogs. We don't believe what the prosecutor's office is telling us," brother Enrique Martinez told The Associated Press.

With this I rest my case. It couldn't of been small tiny dogs that could have easily been beaten away. I say that it was something worse, something perhaps ... a little more human than that.